XYZ Ltd. sold a mine, owned by it for ₹28.20 crore. A minority shareholder brought an action for damages against their directors and against the company itself stating that the real value of the mine was ₹100.00 crore. W

CS Executive · Company Law · PYQS · June 2019
XYZ Ltd. sold a mine, owned by it for ₹28.20 crore. A minority shareholder brought an action for damages against their directors and against the company itself stating that the real value of the mine was ₹100.00 crore. With reference to provisions of Companies Act, 2013 state whether the action for damages is maintainable?

Answer & Explanation:

In the case of Pavlides v. Jensen (1956) Ch. 565 , a minority shareholder brought an action for damages against three directors and against the company itself on the ground that they have been negligent in selling a mine owned by the company for £ 82,000, whereas its real value was about £ 10, 00,000. It was held that the action was not maintainable. The judge observed, "It was open to the company, on the resolution of a majority of the shareholders to sell the mine at a price decided by the company in that manner, and it was open to the company by a vote of majority to decide that if the directors by their negligence or error of judgement has sold the company's mine at an undervalue, proceedings should not be taken against the directors". Applying the above interpretation, the action for damages undertaken by the minority shareholders of XYZ Ltd. is not maintainable. Hence an action for damages neither against the company nor against the directors is valid.

Topics: Minority Protection

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic