Himmat Ltd. has a paid-up capital of ₹ 50,00,000 dividend into 5,00,000 shares of ₹ 10/- each. Special notice of intimation to move a resolution to remove Rajesh & Co., statutory auditor, before the expiry of their t

CS Executive · Company Law · PYQS · June 2021
Himmat Ltd. has a paid-up capital of ₹ 50,00,000 dividend into 5,00,000 shares of ₹ 10/- each. Special notice of intimation to move a resolution to remove Rajesh & Co., statutory auditor, before the expiry of their term and appointing Ritaban & Co. in their place has been given to the company by a shareholder holding 5,023 shares. In the above context, give your suggestion to Himmat Ltd.

Answer & Explanation:

Section 115 read with rule 23 of Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 deals with resolutions requiring special notice. Where a special notice is so required of any resolution, notice of the intention to move such resolution shall be given to the company by such number of members holding not less than 1% of total voting power or holding shares on which the aggregate sum of not less than ₹ 5 Lakhs has been paid-up on the date of notice. The instances which require a special notice under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 are as follows: Under Section 140(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, resolution for appointing a person as auditor at the annual general meeting other than a retiring auditor or providing expressly that the retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed. Under sub-section (2) and (5) of section 169 to remove a director before the expiry of the period of his office and to appoint somebody in place of director so removed in the same meeting. Accordingly, there is no such provision of special notice under the Companies Act, 2013, for removal of statutory auditor. However, the Articles of Association of company may provide for additional matters which may require special notice, in terms of Section 115 of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 140(1) read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, clearly stipulates that the auditor appointed under section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 may be removed from his office before the expiry of his term only by passing a special resolution of the company, after obtaining the previous approval of the Central Government by filling an application in form ADT-2 within 30 days of the resolution passed by the Board. Hence, Rajesh & Co. can be removed by following the prescribed procedures. Further, as per Section 139(8) of the Companies Act, 2013, Ritaban & Co. can be appointed by the Board of Directors within 30 days to fill such casual vacancy.

Topics: Audit and Auditors

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic