MX Ltd. (Target Company) is a listed company. The company has 2 promoters, namely Namita and Sunita who holds paid up equity shares representing 29% and 40% respectively, making the aggregate shareholding of the promoter
CS Executive · Securities Laws and Capital Markets · PYQS · June 2022
MX Ltd. (Target Company) is a listed company. The company has 2 promoters, namely Namita and Sunita who holds paid up equity shares representing 29% and 40% respectively, making the aggregate shareholding of the promoters in the Target company 69%. On 15th February, 2018, Target company allotted 75,00,000 convertible warrants to Namita on preferential basis with due approval from Stock Exchange. These warrants were converted into equity on 30th June, 2018. Pursuant to the conversion, the shareholding of Namita increased from 29% to 37% of the paid up share capital of the Target company. However, during 20th June, 2018 to 25th June, 2018, Sunita sold some shares, thereby reducing the overall promoters shareholding from 69% to 68% of the paid up share capital of the Target company. Would the obligation to make an open offer apply to Namita in view of the fact that the aggregate promoters shareholding post conversion, does not breach the stipulated thresholds under the SAST Regulations?
Answer & Explanation:
Explanation to Regulation 3(2) of the SAST Regulations states that- For the purpose of determining the quantum of acquisition of additional voting rights, the gross acquisitions alone shall be taken into account regardless of any intermittent fall in shareholding or voting rights whether owing to disposal of shares held or dilution of voting rights owing to fresh issue of shares by the target company. Further Regulation 3(3) of the SAST Regulations provides that acquisition of shares by any person, such that the individual shareholding of such person acquiring shares exceed the stipulated thresholds, shall also be attracting the obligation to make an open offer for acquiring shares of the target company irrespective of where there is a change in the aggregate shareholding with persons action in concert. Hence, in view of the above provisions requiring gross acquisition and individual shareholding to consider for the purpose of the SAST Regulations, even though the conversion of warrants by Namita does not cause the aggregate promoter shareholding to breach the stipulated thresholds i.e. 5% under Regulation 3(2), Namita, in her individual capacity would be required to make an open offer under Regulation 3(2) of the SAST Regulations.
Topics: Takeovers
Related Questions in this Topic
- MX Ltd. (Target Company) is a listed company. The company has 2 promoters, namely Namita and Sunita who holds paid up eq...
- MX Ltd. (Target Company) is a listed company. The company has 2 promoters, namely Namita and Sunita who holds paid up eq...
- What is competing offer? What is the timeliness in case of competing offer?
- Nova Industries Ltd. ('Nova') is an Indian company engaged in the business of manufacturing of Automotive Equipments. Th...
- Nova Industries Ltd. ('Nova') is an Indian company engaged in the business of manufacturing of Automotive Equipments. Th...