"A judge is supposed to be indifferent to the parties to the controversy. He cannot act as a judge of a case in which he himself has some interest either pecuniary or otherwise as it affords the strongest proof against n
CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · PYQS · June 2023
"A judge is supposed to be indifferent to the parties to the controversy. He cannot act as a judge of a case in which he himself has some interest either pecuniary or otherwise as it affords the strongest proof against neutrality." Elucidate.
Answer & Explanation:
A judge is supposed to be indifferent to the parties to the controversy. He cannot act as a judge of a case in which he himself has some interest either pecuniary or otherwise as it affords the strongest proof against neutrality. This is because of the importance of one of the most important principles in the administration of justice, i.e. justice must not only be done but also seen to be done. This is necessary to inspire confidence in the people in the judicial system. The given statement is related to Rule against bias which is also one of the important principle of Natural Justice. The rule is discussed as under: According to rule "Rule against bias ( nemo judex in causa sua )" no person should be made a judge in his own cause. Bias means an operative prejudice whether conscious or unconscious in relation to a party or issue. It is a presumption that a person cannot take an objective decision in a case in which he has an interest. The rule against bias has two main aspects- one, that the judge must not have any direct personal stake in the matter at hand and two, there must not be any real likelihood of bias. Bias can be of the following three types: (a) Pecuniary bias: The judicial approach is unanimous on the point that any financial interest of the adjudicatory authority in the matter, howsoever small, would vitiate the adjudication. Thus, a pecuniary interest, howsoever insufficient, will disqualify a person from acting as a Judge. (b) Personal bias: There are number of situations which may create a personal bias in the Judge's mind against one party in dispute before him. He may be friend of the party, or related to him through family, professional or business ties. The judge might also be hostile to one of the parties to a case. All these situations create bias either in favour of or against the party and will operate as a disqualification for a person to act as a Judge. (c) Subject matter bias: A judge may have a bias in the subject matter, which means that he himself is a party, or has some direct connection with the litigation. To disqualify on the ground of bias there must be intimate and direct connection between adjudicator and the issues in dispute.
Topics: Administrative Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- Arvind, a government employee, is facing disciplinary proceedings for alleged misconduct. An inquiry officer, a close re...
- "The court have always insisted that the administrative agencies must follow minimum of fair procedure, i.e., Principal ...
- Ravi, an MBBS student at a reputed government medical college, was removed from the institution on the grounds of 'regul...
- 'The courts in India have developed various formulations to control the exercise of administrative discretion'. Discuss ...
- Suraj owned a mining company and had a lease of 99 years for exploting coal from the coal blocks of the State B. His lea...