Discuss the grounds on which an arbitral award can be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 states that an arbitral award may be set aside by the Court only if, the party making the application establishes on the basis of the record of the arbitral tribunal that- a party was under some incapacity, or the arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law for the time being in force; or the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or the arbitral award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration: Provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the arbitral award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision of this Part from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with this Part; or the Court finds that, the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law for the time being in force, or the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India. Explanation 1 provides as under: For the avoidance of any doubt, it is clarified in the explanation appended to the Section that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if, the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or section 81; or it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice. Explanation 2 provides as under: For the avoidance of doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the merits of the dispute. As per Section 34(2A), an arbitral award arising out of arbitrations, other than international commercial arbitrations, may also be set aside by the Court, if the Court finds that the award is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award. However, an award shall not be set aside merely on the ground of an erroneous application of the law or by re-appreciation of evidence.