ABC Ltd. was incorporated on May 12, 1986, under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra. The present capital structure of the petitioner company is as follows: ₹ 1,000 crore Authori
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · PYQS · June 2024
ABC Ltd. was incorporated on May 12, 1986, under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra. The present capital structure of the petitioner company is as follows: ₹ 1,000 crore Authorised Capital-100 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. Issued Subscribed Capital and paid-up capital of ₹ 780 crore-78 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each [includes equity shares represented by GDRs]. The company is having 4 business segments related to manufacturing of products L, M, N and O. Turnover of O product is around ₹ 1,300 crore. Asset of ABC Ltd are ₹ 2,700 crore out of which product O related asset are ₹ 1,400 crore. XYZ Ltd. is a company having its registered office at Surat, Gujrat. Authorised, issued and paid up capital of company is ₹ 750 crore having turnover of ₹ 820 crore. It is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of product O. Assets of XYZ Ltd. are ₹ 1,500 crore. XYZ Ltd. already hold 14.98% of the equity shares of the ABC Ltd. acquired at ₹ 267 per share from Six ventures and got two directors in Board of Directors of ABC Ltd. XYZ Ltd. has made an open offer to shareholders of ABC Ltd at ₹ 190 per share to acquire controlling stake of ABC Ltd. ABC Ltd. Management opposed the open offer citing reasons of low price that was not beneficial to the shareholders of ABC Ltd. but in reality the management of ABC Ltd. had fear of losing control over the company. XYZ Ltd. had an eye on the Product O business of ABC Ltd. for a long time. The open offer was a step towards fulfilling the dream. Full control of product O business was ultimate purpose of XYZ Ltd. ABC Ltd. script was trading at ₹ 207.50 on the closing hours of trading at the Bombay Stock Exchange. After lot of fights and hassles, both companies came to truce. Pursuant to acquisitions through negotiated transactions, a proposal to demerge the ABC Ltd. company's Product O business into company TRM Ltd. and acquisition of 51% controlling stake in TRM Ltd. was given by XYZ Ltd. and after due deliberation, the Board of Directors of the ABC Ltd company accepted the proposal for demerger of the Product O business into TRM Ltd. and subsequent acquisition of 51% stake in same by XYZ Ltd. After demerger TRM Ltd. will have around 35% market share of product O business on pan India basis. ABC Ltd. Employees Welfare Foundation is an employee welfare trust established under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. Shareholders of ABC Ltd. and XYZ Ltd. call meeting of shareholders, creditors and pass special resolution. They submit copy of resolution to ROC, NCLT and publish in newspaper about successful arrangement. Few members of ABC Ltd. having 1.5% shares of valued ₹ 10 lakh objected to scheme of Acquisition by XYZ Ltd. ABC Ltd. Employee trust also objected to acquisition. NCLT cancelled the scheme citing grounds of unfair, unjust and objections of members having 1.5% shares in company. Based on above facts, answer the following with reasons quoting relevant provisions: Is it a hostile or friendly acquisition ? Is it beneficial to go for taking control of ABC Ltd for gaining access to product O business or is it beneficial to cause demerger of Product O business by ABC Ltd into TRM Ltd and then acquiring of 51% controlling stake in same by XYZ Ltd? Will it result in reduction of capital requiring separate approvals? Explain briefly.
Answer & Explanation:
Takeovers that occur without consent of acquired company/ target company are commonly called hostile takeovers. Here earlier attempt by ZYZ Ltd. to give open offer for Controlling stake and onboarding two directors in ABC Ltd. can be termed as hostile. But subsequent agreement and steps taken for demerger of Product O business and then taking 51% stake in TRM Ltd. give narrative of agreed/ friendly acquisition. Taking of controlling stake in ABC Ltd. only for product O business seems hostile takeover and unnecessarily being saddled with burden of managing of L, M and N product segments of ABC Ltd. when company XYZ Ltd. is really interested in taking product O business of ABC Ltd. Moreover, complexity of compliances/approvals/cross border issues will increase. Demerger into TRM Ltd. seems more focused approach. Pursuant to Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may propose for compromise or arrangement with its creditors or its members which may include reduction of share capital of the company and NCLT will permit the same under section 230 and 232 of companies Act, 2013, separate compliance under section 66 is not required.
Topics: Corporate Restructuring
Related Questions in this Topic
- Company A merges with Company B. The companies sign the agreement on January 1, 2026. The board decides to set the fi...
- StellarTech, a privately held company specializing in innovative battery technology for electric vehicles, has experienc...
- ABC Ltd. wanted to buy back its shares and provided the following information as on 31st March, 2026: 60,000 equity shar...
- X Ltd. makes a bid to purchase Company Y Ltd. Y Ltd. rejects the bid and thereafter used a strategy against X Ltd. to st...
- Restructuring aims at improving the competitive position of an individual business and maximizing its contribution to co...