The Registrar of Companies (ROC) suo moto on internal investigation conducted after suspicion on the information contained in some documents and returns filed by BPK Ltd. under the Companies Act, 2013 found that the cert
CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · PYQS · June 2024
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) suo moto on internal investigation conducted after suspicion on the information contained in some documents and returns filed by BPK Ltd. under the Companies Act, 2013 found that the certifying professional has furnished wrong/false/misleading information or omission of material facts to the Government under his signature. What actions can be taken by the Regulator under Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 against certifying professional in this regard ?
Answer & Explanation:
A wrong signing/e-certification leads to the threat to the company, its authorised person and to the certifying professional. The action taken by the Regulator is as follows: In the case of certification of any form, document, application or return under the act containing wrong or false or misleading information or omission of material fact or attachments by the person, the Digital Signature Certificate shall be de-activated by the Central Government till a final decision is taken in this regard. As per MCA circular no. 10/2014 dated 07.05.2014, where any instance of filing of documents, application or return or form etc., containing false or misleading information or omission of material fact or incomplete information is observed, the Regional Director or the Registrar as the case may be, shall conduct a quick inquiry against the professionals who certified the form and signatory thereof including an officer in default who appears prima facie responsible for submitting false or misleading or incorrect information pursuant to requirement of above said Rules, 15 days' notice may be given for the purpose. The Regional Director or the Registrar will submit his/her report in respect of the inquiry initiated, irrespective of the outcome, to the E-Governance cell of the Ministry within 15 days of the expiry of period given for submission of an explanation with recommendation in initiating action under section 447 and 448 of the Companies Act, 2013, wherever applicable and also regarding referral of the matter to the concerned professional Institute for initiating disciplinary proceedings. The E-Governance cell of the Ministry shall process each case so referred and issue necessary instructions to the Regional Director/ Registrar of Companies for initiating action under section 448 and 449 of the Companies Act, 2013, wherever prima facie cases have been made out. The E-Governance cell will thereafter refer such cases to the concerned Institute for conducting disciplinary proceedings against the errant member as well as debar the concerned professional from filing any document on the MCA portal in future. The Registrar shall forward a fortnightly report to the concerned Regional Director as well as to the E-Governance Division. Thereafter, the Regional Director shall forward a consolidated report to the Joint Secretary, E-Governance Division on or before 7th of every month.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013 / Compliance Management
Related Questions in this Topic
- Dr. Ltd. is a listed entity incorporated on 11th January 2018 under the Companies Act, 2013 having its registered office...
- The Compounding order for an offence under the Companies Act, 2013 in case of VVC Ltd. was issued by the compounding aut...
- The main objective of appraisal of management decision is to see how decisions are taken by the Management. Discuss the ...
- Forming of Opinion based on the audit observations is an important part of any audit, as through this process, the outco...
- Internal auditors of NPD Ltd. have completed the internal audit of manufacturing division of the company and now have to...