The promoter of a company borrowed a loan of ₹ 25 lakh on behalf of his company from the respondent. Later, at the request of respondent, the promoter sent a cheque from the company's account. However, the cheque was dis

CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · PYQS · December 2024
The promoter of a company borrowed a loan of ₹ 25 lakh on behalf of his company from the respondent. Later, at the request of respondent, the promoter sent a cheque from the company's account. However, the cheque was dishonoured. The respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 with reference to dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc, of funds in the account, against the promoter/the borrower and another in connection with the bouncing of a cheque issued on behalf of the company. This complaint was challenged on the ground that, the promoter is neither a director nor a person-in-charge of the company and is not connected with the day-to-day affairs of the company and had neither opened nor is operating the bank account of the company and had not issued the cheque which was dishonoured and further contended that in any event notice of dishonour of the cheque was not served. Subsequently the complaint was lodged against the promoter (borrower). Based on the facts, answer the following questions: Whether dishonour of the cheque on each occasion of its presentation give rise to a fresh cause of action ?

Answer & Explanation:

According to Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act), notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,- (a) no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 138 except upon a complaint, in writing, made by the payee or, as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque; (b) such complaint is made within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to section 138. Section 138 of the Act provides the provisions relating to Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account. The proviso to this section gives the indication with respect to cause of action. It states: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless- (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier; (b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice; in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within thirty days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and (c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice. Therefore, it may be said that cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to section 138 i.e. when the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice and not on dishonour of cheque on each occasion.

Topics: Negotiable Instruments Act

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic