There are numerous definitions of insurance. Based on the definition of insurance stated in the text, indicate whether each of the following guarantees is considered insurance. A television set is guaranteed by the manuf
CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · PYQS · June 2025
There are numerous definitions of insurance. Based on the definition of insurance stated in the text, indicate whether each of the following guarantees is considered insurance. A television set is guaranteed by the manufacturer against defects for 90 days. A new set of radial tyres is guaranteed by the manufacturer against road defects for 50,000 miles. A builder of new homes gives a ten-year guarantee against structural defects in the construction. A large group of homeowners agree to pay for losses to homes during the year because of fire.
Answer & Explanation:
Insurance is a form of contract or an arrangement where one party agrees in return for a consideration (premium) to pay an agreed amount of money to another party to make good the loss, damage or injury to something of value in which the insured has an interest. Being a contract of indemnity, it is based on the principle of utmost good faith. A guarantee, on the other hand, covers the non-performance of a specific obligation. Based on this distinction, let's analyze each scenario: A television set is guaranteed by the manufacturer against defects for 90 days. This is a guarantee , not insurance. The manufacturer is directly liable for the quality of its product and promises to repair or replace it if defects occur within a specified period. There is no transfer of risk to a third party for a premium. A new set of radial tyres is guaranteed by the manufacturer against road defects for 50,000 miles. This is also a guarantee . Similar to the television set, the manufacturer is taking direct responsibility for the performance of its product under certain conditions. It does not involve the principles of risk pooling or insurable interest in the insurance sense. A builder of new homes gives a ten-year guarantee against structural defects in the construction. This is a guarantee . The builder is directly responsible for the quality of construction for a specified period. This is a contractual obligation of the builder, not an insurance contract where risk is transferred to an insurer for a premium. A large group of homeowners agree to pay for losses to homes during the year because of fire. This is considered a form of insurance (or mutual insurance/risk pooling). In this scenario, a group of individuals (homeowners) collectively agree to share the financial burden of losses (due to fire) that may occur to any member's home. This involves the pooling of risk and mutual indemnity, which are fundamental characteristics of insurance, even if it's not a formal insurance company. Each member effectively pays a 'premium' (their agreement to contribute) and has an 'insurable interest' in their own home and potentially in the homes of others within the group to the extent of their shared liability. In summary, the first three cases are guarantees where the primary party (manufacturer/builder) retains the risk and provides assurance, while the fourth case involves risk transfer and pooling among a group, which aligns with the concept of insurance.
Topics: Insurance Contracts
Related Questions in this Topic
- A, purchased a flat of ₹ 25.00 lakh, taking a loan of ₹ 20.00 lakh from a bank and balance of ₹ 5.00 lakh was paid out o...
- What is the difference between subject-matter of insurance and the subject-matter of a contract of fire insurance?
- A sells his house to B, and a fire occurs before the insurance on the house is cancelled by A. Who can collect the insur...
- An Insured applies for life insurance and states in the application that he has not visited a doctor during the last fiv...
- How can you differentiate between a warranty and a representation ?