Mihir Sen was in service of Sona Motors India Private Ltd (Sona Motors) during the period 2006 to 2014. Sona Motors decided to post him on a foreign assignment with its group company, Mona Motors (Japan). Accordingly, an
CS Professional · Labour Laws and Practice · PYQS · June 2025
Mihir Sen was in service of Sona Motors India Private Ltd (Sona Motors) during the period 2006 to 2014. Sona Motors decided to post him on a foreign assignment with its group company, Mona Motors (Japan). Accordingly, an Agreement of Assignment of Contract of Appointment was executed between Sona Motors and Mihir Sen, by which his services were placed with the Host Company, Mona Motors (Japan) w.e.f. 1st March 2014 wherein Mihir Sen continued to work in terms of the said agreement upto 25th June 2022 when he came to be relieved by the host company, consequent to the resignation tendered by him on 5th April 2022. Sona Motors declined to treat Mihir Sen's connection with Sona Motors after he was assigned to the Host Company for the purpose of payment of Gratuity. Decide with the help of case law, whether transfer of Mihir Sen to another company under same management, i.e., Mona Motors (Japan) will be considered as continuity of service for payment of Gratuity ?
Answer & Explanation:
According to Section 2A(1), for the purposes of this the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, an employee shall be said to be in 'continuous service' for a period if he has, for that period been in un-interrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness, accident, leave, absence from duty without leave (not being absence in respect of which an order treating the absence as break in service has been passed in accordance with the standing orders, rules or regulations governing the employees of the establishment), layoff, strike or a lock-out or cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee, whether such uninterrupted or interrupted service was rendered before or after the commencement of this Act. In the case of Mercedes Benz India Private Limited Vs. Noshir Nadir Desai , the High Court held that mere transfer of employees to another company wherein the ultimate management is common cannot be termed as discontinuation of service. The employer Mercedes Benz continued to be the primary/parent employer even during assignment of the employee to the Host Company Daimler AG. High Court also observed that it is because of the common management of both the companies that this transfer took place and also referred the Agreement where it was clearly mentioned that the provisions of the existing employment contract with the Home Company shall continue to apply unless this Supplementary Agreement provides otherwise. In view of the above decided case, transfer of Mihir Sen to another company under same management, i.e, Mona Motors (Japan) will be considered as continuity of service for payment of Gratuity.
Topics: Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
Related Questions in this Topic
- The relevant provisions of the Conduct, Discipline & Appeal Rules (CDA Rules) of the company, contain a deeming provisio...
- MN Ltd., a logistics company conducting delivery operations across multiple states, employs nearly 500 delivery personne...
- Enumerate any 10 salient features of the Occupational, Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020.
- What are the compliances to be made by the Employer under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohi...
- In the case concerning Manjeet Singh and Indraprastha Gas Limited in the Delhi High Court, the controversy emerged withi...