The United Kingdom based Company BREXIT along with members of the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) filed a suit before the Delhi High Court for permanent injunction to prevent the Defendant, Golden Bottling Ltd., an India

The United Kingdom based Company BREXIT along with members of the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) filed a suit before the Delhi High Court for permanent injunction to prevent the Defendant, Golden Bottling Ltd., an Indian based company from selling whisky under the name "Red Scot" or any other similar designation incorporating the word "Scot", that creates misrepresentation with the genuine Scotch whisky. The SWA had previously many times appealed to the defendant from using the word 'Scot' or 'Scotch' in their whisky productions and dealings, for two years, the defendant dropped using the word Scot in their product, later on again it was found that the defendant was still selling Red Scot Whisky in the market. Therefore, the plaintiff filed a suit before the Delhi High Court. Subsequently, a summon was duly served accompanied by an injunction to prohibit the defendant from further using the word Red Scot or Scot. However, despite service of the summons, the defendant did not appear before the court. Consequently, the Court continued the proceedings ex parte against the defendant. The Delhi High Court in its final verdict provided a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff as they sought, and also ordered compensation amounting to Rupees Five Lakh along with litigation cost. In the light of the above case, answer the following questions: How does the court's interpretation of software as a 'literary work' under the Copyright Act, 1957, influence the legal protection of digital intellectual property in India?