A change may not be considered reasonable if it appears that the change relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory. Justify your answer with an example and explaining when there shou
CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · PYQS · December 2025
A change may not be considered reasonable if it appears that the change relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory. Justify your answer with an example and explaining when there should be changes in terms of engagement. Elucidate what precautions, the Auditor should take while accepting the change in terms of engagement ?
Answer & Explanation:
A change may not be considered reasonable if it appears that the change relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory. For example, where the Auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding labor law compliance by the company and the Appointing Authority asks for the Audit Engagement to be changed to a review engagement to avoid a modified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion. The Auditor shall not agree to a change in the terms of the Audit Engagement where there is no reasonable justification for doing so. If the terms of the Audit Engagement are changed, the Auditor and the Appointing Authority shall agree on the new terms of the engagement by way of a supplementary/revised engagement letter or any other suitable form in writing signed by the Appointing Authority with justification for the change. A request from the Appointing Authority to change the terms of Audit Engagement may result from a change in circumstances affecting the need for the service or a restriction on the scope of Audit Engagement, whether imposed by Management or caused by other circumstances. The Auditor shall consider the justification given for the request, particularly the implication of a restriction on the scope of the Audit Engagement. A change in circumstances that affects the Auditee's requirements may be considered a reasonable basis for requesting a change in the Audit Engagement. With mutual consent the terms of the Audit Engagement may be changed. When such changes are there, the Auditor shall obtain the supplementary/revised engagement letter with a justification for the change and it shall be duly signed by the Appointing Authority. The impact of such change on the level of assurance shall be ascertained before accepting the same. If change in the terms of Audit Engagement is likely to result in a lower level of assurance, then the Auditor may accept such change only if such change can adequately be covered by way of modified report. The Auditor should take the following precautions while accepting the change: The Auditor should not agree to a change in the terms of the Audit Engagement which restricts the scope of audit provided under any statutes. If the term of the Audit Engagement is changed when it is expected that Auditor may have to issue a modified report, such type of changes should be resisted. Any request to change to avoid or circumvent unfavourable Auditor's report is also unjustified and should not be accepted. If the terms of the Audit Engagement are changed before the completion of the audit, the Auditor should not disregard the evidences obtained prior to the change in scope of audit.
Topics: Audit Engagement
Related Questions in this Topic
- An auditor may be appointed either as a result of one-to-one communication between the auditor and the Management or thr...
- The main objective of appraisal of management decision is to see how decisions are taken by the Management. Discuss the ...
- Forming of Opinion based on the audit observations is an important part of any audit, as through this process, the outco...
- Internal auditors of NPD Ltd. have completed the internal audit of manufacturing division of the company and now have to...
- Fraud detection and reporting requires the practicing Company Secretaries to focus beyond compliance. Discuss the statem...