Omkar Finance Pvt. Ltd. is a company engaged primarily in the business of granting loans and advances and earns about 85% of its income from lending activities. During the Previous Year 2025-26, the company granted a loa

CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · PYQS · June 2026
Omkar Finance Pvt. Ltd. is a company engaged primarily in the business of granting loans and advances and earns about 85% of its income from lending activities. During the Previous Year 2025-26, the company granted a loan of ₹ 40 lakh to Mr. Suresh, who holds 12% of the voting power in Omkar Finance Pvt. Ltd. The loan was granted at a commercial rate of interest and was approved on the same terms and conditions as those applicable to other customers of the company. The Assessing Officer contends that the loan is liable to be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income tax Act, 1961. However, the company argues that the loan was granted in the ordinary course of its business, and that lending of money constitutes a substantial part of its business. You are required to examine whether the loan granted to Mr. Suresh would be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). Give reason for your answer.

Answer & Explanation:

As per Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, any loan or advance given by a closely held company to a shareholder who holds not less than 10% of the voting power is treated as deemed dividend to the extent of the company's accumulated profits. However, the section provides an exception that such loan or advance shall not be treated as deemed dividend if: 1. The loan or advance is made in the ordinary course of the company's business, and 2. Lending of money constitutes a substantial part of the business of the company. Application to the Given Facts: Mr. Suresh holds 12% of the voting power in Omkar Finance Pvt. Ltd. Hence, the basic condition for applicability of Section 2(22)(e) is satisfied. However, Omkar Finance Pvt. Ltd. is primarily engaged in the business of granting loans and advances. The company earns 85% of its income from lending activities, which indicates that lending of money is a substantial part of its business. The loan of ₹ 40 lakh was granted at a commercial rate of interest and on the same terms as applicable to other customers, indicating that it was given in the ordinary course of business. Conclusion: Since the loan was granted in the ordinary course of business and lending of money constitutes a substantial part of the company's business, the exception provided under Section 2(22)(e) applies. Therefore, the loan of ₹ 40 lakh granted to Mr. Suresh will not be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Topics: Corporate Tax Planning

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic