In recent years, India has witnessed an unprecedented transformation in its financial services sector. The widespread adoption of smartphones and various government initiatives such as Digital India have accelerated the

CS Professional · Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics and Cyber Security - Laws and Practice · PYQS · June 2026
In recent years, India has witnessed an unprecedented transformation in its financial services sector. The widespread adoption of smartphones and various government initiatives such as Digital India have accelerated the shift toward digital payments and online financial services. One of the key organizations at the center of this transformation in PaySure FinTech Solutions Pvt. Ltd., a rapidly growing financial technology company headquartered in Bengaluru. PaySure specializes in providing digital payment infrastructure for banks, e-commerce platforms and small businesses across India. Its services include real-time payment processing, fraud detection analytics, cross-border remittance platforms and blockchain-based smart contract systems for automated financial settlements. The company processes millions of financial transactions every day through mobile wallets, digital banking APIs and merchant payment gateways. Because it handles large volumes of sensitive financial data—including customer identities, transaction histories, biometric authentication records and merchant settlement information—PaySure plays a critical role in India's digital financial ecosystem. However, as digital transactions increased dramatically, so did the complexity of cybersecurity threats facing the organization. Cybercriminal networks began targeting payment systems with increasingly sophisticated attacks, including phishing campaigns, malware-based account takeovers, distributed denial-of-service attacks and automated fraud schemes. To address these threats, PaySure's Chief Technology Officer proposed the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) based fraud detection systems combined with blockchain technology to create a more transparent and secure payment infrastructure. The idea was to use AI algorithms to detect suspicious transaction patterns while using blockchain's distributed ledger to ensure tamper-resistant transaction records. At the same time, the company deployed a machine learning fraud detection system designed to analyze massive datasets of financial transactions. The system monitored behavioural patterns such as transaction timing, device usage, geographic locations and spending patterns to identify potential fraud attempts. The company's legal advisors reminded management that although blockchain systems can automate financial processes, organizations must still comply with existing regulatory frameworks such as the Information Technology Act, 2000 and financial guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India. Under the IT Act, unauthorized access to computer systems and data manipulation are criminal offenses. In addition, organizations handling digital financial information must implement reasonable security practices to protect customer data. The company also needed to comply with provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, which imposes strict requirements regarding the collection, processing and storage of personal data. While the legal and compliance teams were still analyzing the implications of blockchain technology, PaySure faced another major security incident. The company's cybersecurity monitoring system detected unusual traffic patterns originating from one of its internal analytics servers. Investigators discovered that an employee from the data science team had accessed confidential datasets containing millions of anonymized transaction records used to train the AI fraud detection system. During the investigation, analysts discovered that the suspect had attempted to delete several log files and temporary records to conceal the unauthorized data transfer. However, forensic experts were able to recover fragments of the deleted files using specialized digital forensic software tools. Despite recovering the data, investigators encountered serious procedural challenges. Some of the evidence had been collected after the suspect's computer had already been shut down, which resulted in the loss of volatile memory data such as encryption keys and active process information. Furthermore, the company's legal department raised concerns regarding the chain of custody documentation associated with the digital evidence. In Indian courts, electronic evidence must comply with strict legal standards under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, which requires proper certification regarding how electronic records were collected and preserved. Some customers also expressed concerns about how their financial data was being used to train AI models. Even though the data used by PaySure had been anonymized, critics argued that large-scale data analytics could still pose risks to individual privacy. The company's Board of Directors realized that adopting emerging technologies like AI and blockchain required not only technical expertise but also a robust governance framework capable of addressing legal, ethical and cybersecurity challenges. To address these concerns, PaySure established a Technology Governance and Ethics Committee responsible for overseeing AI development, data protection policies, vendor contracts and cybersecurity risk management. The PaySure case illustrates the complex challenges faced by organizations operating at the intersection of financial technology, artificial intelligence, blockchain innovation and cybersecurity governance. While advanced technologies can significantly improve operational efficiency and fraud detection capabilities, they also introduce new risks involving data privacy, legal compliance, cybercrime investigations and public trust. In view of the above, answer the following: The PaySure FinTech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. needed to comply with provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. How the company can establish Data Protection Board and how it may work as per the key provisions of the DPDP Act, 2023?

Answer & Explanation:

Chapter V of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act empowered the Central Government to establish Data Protection Board. The Data Protection Board will function as an impartial adjudicatory body responsible for resolving privacy-related grievances and disputes between relevant parties. As an independent regulator, it will possess the authority to ascertain instances of non-compliance with the Act's provisions and impose penalties accordingly. The appointment of the chief executive and board members of the Data Protection Board will be carried out by the central government, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process. To provide an avenue for customers to challenge decisions made by the Data Protection Board, the government will establish an appellate body. This appellate body may be assigned to the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), which will be responsible for adjudicating disputes related to data protection and hearing appeals against the decisions made by the Data Protection Board. Chapter VI of the DPDP Act provides the provision relating to powers, functions and procedure to be followed by Board. Data Protection Board has the authority to accept a voluntary commitment related to compliance with the DPDP Act, 2023 provisions from any data fiduciary at any stage of complaint proceedings. This voluntary undertaking may entail specific actions to be taken or refrained from by the concerned party. Furthermore, the terms of the voluntary undertaking can be modified by the Board if necessary. The voluntary undertaking serves as a legal barrier to proceedings concerning the subject matter of the commitment, unless the data fiduciary fails to adhere to its terms. In the event of non-compliance, such a breach is considered a violation of the DPDP Act, and the Board is authorized to impose penalties for this infringement. Additionally, the Board has the discretion to require the undertaking to be made public.

Topics: Data Protection

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic