Whether your answer would be same if in 2017, B and C had taken a new partner D and then filed a suit against X without fresh registration ?
CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · PYQS · June 2026
Whether your answer would be same if in 2017, B and C had taken a new partner D and then filed a suit against X without fresh registration ?
Answer & Explanation:
Further in 2017, B and C had taken a new partner, D, and then filed a suit against X without fresh registration. Where a new partner is introduced, the fact is to be notified to Registrar who shall make a record of the notice in the entry relating to the firm in the Register of firms. In this case, the second condition that partners suing should be named as partners of the firm is not fulfilled, as the name of D is not registered. Therefore, the suit filed after D joins the firm without registration, is not maintainable.
Topics: Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Related Questions in this Topic
- A & Co. is registered as a partnership firm in 2015 with A, B and C partners. In 2016, A dies. In 2017, B and C sue X in...
- A partnership firm consisting of A, B and C was dissolved. The firm had outside creditors, and there were also certain a...
- The Indian Partnership Act of 1932 makes firm registration either optional or compulsory, but there are a number of reas...
- M, N and P were partners in a firm. The firm ordered JR Limited to supply the furniture. P dies, and M and N continues t...
- Ram, representing the 'Greenwood Apartment Owners Association', has approached you to facilitate the formal registration...