A, B and C are the partners in the partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932 in the name of ABC Traders. Considering the benefits available to Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) under the Limited Liabi
CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · PYQS · December 2023
A, B and C are the partners in the partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932 in the name of ABC Traders. Considering the benefits available to Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, the partnership firm is converted into LLP with the name ABC LLP and the same is registered. The Department of State Revenue issues a notice to the LLP to pay stamp duty and registration charges for transferring the assets of the erstwhile partnership firm to LLP. It is contended by the Department that the LLP is a separate distinct entity from that of its partners and hence the conversion amounts to change of legal rights. In the light of the decided case law, examine the validity of the contention of the Department of State Revenue.
Answer & Explanation:
This given case is similar to a decided case law i.e., Sozin Flora Pharma LLP vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Another . The facts of the case are as follows: In 2005, the petitioner was registered as a partnership firm in the name and style of M/S Sozin Flora Pharma, under the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. In 2016, the firm was converted into LLP with the name M/S Sozin Flora Pharma LLP, and the same was registered. However, the Department of State Revenue asked the LLP to pay stamp duty and registration charges for transferring the assets of the erstwhile partnership firm to the LLP. The petitioner [LLP] explained that upon conversion into LLP, the vesting of property of the firm in the LLP is automatic, and therefore it is not liable to pay stamp duty and registration charges. On behalf of the State, it was contended that the LLP is a separate distinct entity from that of its partners, and hence the conversion amounts to change of legal rights. The Hon'ble Court made reference to Section 58 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 and held that the transfer and vestment of property of a partnership firm in favor of a converted LLP is statutory and is by operation of law; the legal entity is not changed after conversion, only the identity of the petitioner firm as a legal entity undergoes a change, and the order of the Revenue Department was quashed and set aside. Hence, stamp duty and registration charges cannot be levied upon transferring the assets of the erstwhile partnership firm to LLP. Therefore, the contention of the Department of State Revenue is not valid.
Topics: Limited Liability Partnership
Related Questions in this Topic
- What are the records, returns and notices that an employer is required to maintain and comply with under the Code on Wag...
- What interim measures can the Internal Committee recommend to the employer during the pendency of an inquiry under the S...
- Explain the qualifications required for engaging an apprentice and outline the contractual formalities prescribed under ...
- Discuss the need and objectives of bringing in the New Labour Codes.
- Rohan is an adolescent employed at GS General Grocery Store. His regular working hours are from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.,...