X filed a suit to recover possession of a movable property against Y. During the hearing, X alleged that Y may dispose of the property to his benefit. If you are a presiding officer of a court how you will decide the cas

As the presiding officer of the court, I would carefully consider X's suit to recover possession of the movable property against Y, along with the allegation that Y may dispose of the property to his benefit. In such cases, the issuance of a temporary injunction or stay order can be crucial to prevent the alleged wrongful disposal of the property. It is necessary to refer to the following points: A. The case of Dalpat Kumar and Ors. vs. Prahlad Singh and Ors. (16.12.1991-SC): AIR 1993 SC 276 In this case, Court held that three main requirements are to be satisfied while granting a temporary injunction: There should be a Prima facie case If an injunction is not granted, it would lead to irreparable loss and, Balance of convenience. It was stated by the Court that: "Satisfaction that there is a prima facie case by itself is not sufficient to grant the injunction. The Court further has to satisfy that non-interference by the Court would result in "irreparable injury" to the party seeking relief and that there is no other remedy available to the party except one to grant the injunction and he needs protection from the consequences of apprehended injury or dispossession. The third condition also is that "the balance of convenience" must be in favor of granting an injunction. B. Provision relating to Power to order interim sale As per Rule 6 of Order XXXIX, the Court may, on the application of any party to a suit, order the sale, by any person named in such order, and in such manner and on such terms as it thinks fit, of any movable property, being the subject-matter of such suit, or attached before judgment in such suit, which is subject to speedy and natural delay, or which for any other just and sufficient cause, it may be desirable to have sold at once. After analyzing the facts and circumstances of the case, I am likely to give necessary relief as per the above mentioned discussion.