"Energize-52" is a popular cough syrup manufactured since 2015 by "Jeevan Pharma Company". The trade mark "Energize-52" was registered in 2017, and almost seven years had expired from the date of its registration. This s

CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · PYQS · December 2024
"Energize-52" is a popular cough syrup manufactured since 2015 by "Jeevan Pharma Company". The trade mark "Energize-52" was registered in 2017, and almost seven years had expired from the date of its registration. This syrup was highly popular among the consumers who asked for "Energize-52" over the other syrups available and the voluminous sales figures prove its widespread consumer recognition. In January 2024 "Jeevan Pharma Company" discovered that a new Competitor in the market had also launched a similar syrup under the brand name "Energize-T" using a logo and brand name that is deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of "Energize-52". In view of the above case, answer the following questions with support of relevant provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: (iv) What are the relative grounds for refusal of trade mark registration ?

Answer & Explanation:

Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 stipulate on Relative Grounds for Refusal of Registration. Section 11(1) provides that a trade mark shall not be registered if, because of: its identity with an earlier trade mark and similarity of goods or services covered by the trade mark; or its similarity to an earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade mark, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark. Section 11 (2) states that a trade mark which (a) is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark; and (b) is to be registered for goods or services which are not similar to those for which the earlier trade mark is registered in the name of a different proprietor, shall not be registered if or to the extent the earlier trade mark is a well-known trade mark in India and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade mark. Section 11 (3) provides that a trade mark shall not be registered if, or to the extent that, its use in India is liable to be prevented— by virtue of any law in particular the law of passing off protecting an unregistered trade mark used in the course of trade; or by virtue of law of copyright.

Topics: Trade Marks Act, 1999

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic