Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. obtained registration of the trade mark "GREENBITE" in 2016 for packaged fruit juices. However, after registration, the company did not start production or sale of fruit juices under the said trade
CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · PYQS · June 2026
Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. obtained registration of the trade mark "GREENBITE" in 2016 for packaged fruit juices. However, after registration, the company did not start production or sale of fruit juices under the said trade mark for several years. In 2023, another company Healthy Drinks Ltd. applied to the Registrar for removal of the trade mark "GREENBITE" from the register, claiming that the mark had not been used for more than five years from the date of its registration. Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. argued that the non-use of the mark was due to government restrictions on the import of certain ingredients required for manufacturing the product, which prevented them from using the mark. State the provision relating to Removal of Trade Mark for Non-use. Discuss whether the non-use of the trade mark by Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. can be justified on the ground of special circumstances in trade under Section 47(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Answer & Explanation:
Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 deals with removal of a trade mark from the register on the ground of non-use and provides that a trade mark which is not used within five years of its registration, becomes liable for removal either completely or in respect of those goods or services for which the mark has not been used. The five years period starts from the date on which the trade mark is actually entered on the register. However, Section 47(3) protects a mark from being removed from the register on ground of non-use if such non-use is shown to have been due to special circumstances in the trade which may include restriction imposed by any law or regulation on the use of trade mark in India and not to any intention to abandon or not to use the trade mark in relation to the goods or services to which the application relates. In the present case, the trade mark "GREENBITE" was registered in 2016, and more than five years have elapsed without use of the mark, making it liable to be removed from the register on the ground of non-use. However, Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. contends that the non-use occurred due to government restrictions on the import of certain ingredients required for manufacturing the fruit juices If these restrictions prevented the company from producing the goods and using the trade mark, it may constitute special circumstances in trade. Therefore, if Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. proves that the non-use of the trade mark was due to government restrictions and not due to an intention to abandon the mark, the non-use may be justified under Section 47(3) and the trade mark may not be removed from the register.
Topics: Intellectual Property Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- Explain the term "Industrial Property" under Intellectual Property Rights?
- Explain the essential requirements for the registration of a 'Design' under the Designs Act, 2000.
- What is meant by copyright under Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 in relation to a computer programme and an artist...
- What is the tort of passing off in relation to unregistered trademarks? What are the essential elements that a plaintiff...
- Elegant Furniture Pvt. Ltd. created a new ornamental design for a dining chair and obtained registration of the design u...