Ananya Rao is a senior officer working in a Government-owned company. She was invited by a Canadian organisation to attend and speak at a conference in Canada. The organisation offered to pay for her flight, hotel stay a

CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · PYQS · June 2026
Ananya Rao is a senior officer working in a Government-owned company. She was invited by a Canadian organisation to attend and speak at a conference in Canada. The organisation offered to pay for her flight, hotel stay and other expenses. She accepted the offer without taking permission from the Central Government. She says the visit was in her personal capacity and not related to her official work. After returning to India, she did not inform the Government about the hospitality she received. In this situation answer the following with reason: Whether saying that the visit was in her personal capacity excuses her from the legal requirement.

Answer & Explanation:

Section 6 does not distinguish between official and personal visits. The restriction applies based on the status of the person (e.g., Government servant or employee of a Government controlled body), not on the purpose of the visit. In the given situation, Ms. Rao's argument that the visit was in her personal capacity is not legally valid. The statutory requirement is triggered by her position as an employee of a Government owned corporation. Therefore, irrespective of whether the visit was personal or official, prior permission was mandatory. Accordingly, her acceptance of foreign hospitality without permission violates Section 6 of the FCRA, 2010.

Topics: Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic