Case Study: Background: Swash Infra Limited, incorporated in 2021 under the provisions of Companies Act 2013 is presently engaged solely in infrastructure-related activities in line with its existing object clause. The c
CS Executive · Company Law and Practice · PYQS · June 2026
Case Study: Background: Swash Infra Limited, incorporated in 2021 under the provisions of Companies Act 2013 is presently engaged solely in infrastructure-related activities in line with its existing object clause. The company has built a strong market presence through high-quality products and robust post-sale services, resulting in consistent profits since inception. This operational success and evolving strategic outlook form the basis for the issues discussed in the subsequent paragraphs. I. Name Change Given its profitable operations, expanding business aspirations and also with the advice of one of the renowned astrologers the board of the directors of the company decided to change its name to reflect a broader business outlook. The company passed a special resolution and filed an application with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) on 25 May 2026 for approval of a change in its name to Swaarna Infra & Realty Limited. During examination of the application, the ROC noted that the company had not filed its annual return for FY 2024-25 in Form MGT-7, although the financial statements for the same year had been filed. The directors remain confident that the application will be approved. II. Future Projects Despite being profitable in the infrastructure sector, the promoters intend to diversify into the Renewable Energy Infrastructure business after three years. They have already developed certain intellectual properties for the proposed venture and also wish to purchase land now for use in the future project. However, the existing object clause of Swash Infra Limited does not permit such activities or holding assets relating to the renewable energy sector, and the promoters do not wish to alter the object clause at this stage. They also confirm that no accounting transaction or business activity relating to the proposed project will be undertaken at present and till the projects become operational. The promoters, however want the intellectual property and the proposed land to be held under a corporate structure rather than in their personal names and therefore seek advice from the Practising Company Secretary (PCS) on how this may be achieved without altering the existing object clause. III. Status as a Listed Company The Board of Directors is considering issuing non-convertible redeemable preference shares (NCRPS) to augment financial resources. During preliminary discussions, the Company Secretary suggested that the company could list the proposed issue of NCRPS on the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE). The Board seeks a legal opinion from the PCS on whether such a listing would confer the status of a "listed company". IV. Threat of a Trade Union A recognised trade union of the company is on strike, alleging unfair labour practices, including non-payment of bonus despite high profits. A workman of the union has created a video disk containing material that the company considers could be potentially defamatory and has also threatened to release it on social media. The Managing Director has instructed the Company Secretary to explore the possibility of obtaining legal measures to restrain the union and workmen from releasing the video. V. CARO 2020 For the financial year ending 31st March 2026, the statutory auditor submitted the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2020 (CARO 2020) report. In relation to physical verification of inventory, the auditor noted that: The management has not conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals. No proper treatment of discrepancies of 10% or more has been made by the company. The auditor did not provide any explanation for these observations. The Board seeks clarification on the applicability of CARO 2020 to the company and whether the auditor's report complies with the reporting requirements, particularly in the light of the remarks on inventory verification. Based on the information provided above and with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, answer the following: Explain the meaning of a "listed company" and examine whether the Company Secretary's suggestion is justified i.e., whether the company would become a listed company by listing its proposed non-convertible redeemable preference shares on a recognized stock exchange such as the National Stock Exchange of India.
Answer & Explanation:
As per Clause (52) of Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 "Listed Company" means a company which has any of its securities listed on any recognised stock exchange; Provided that such class of companies, which have listed or intend to list such class of securities, as may be prescribed in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Board, shall not be considered as listed companies. Companies not to be considered as listed companies [Rule 2A of the Companies (Specification of definitions details) Rules, 2014]. The following classes of companies shall not be considered as listed companies, namely: - a) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange but have listed their - (i) non-convertible debt securities issued on private placement basis in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008; or (ii) non-convertible redeemable preference shares issued on private placement basis in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Non-Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares) Regulations, 2013; or b) Private companies which have listed their non-convertible debt securities on private placement basis on a recognized stock exchange in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008. c) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange but whose equity shares are listed on a stock exchange in a jurisdiction as specified in section 23(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Analysis and Conclusion: Since the company has not listed its equity shares and the proposed non-convertible redeemable preference shares are to be listed only on a private placement basis, Rule 2A expressly provides that such public companies shall not be regarded as listed companies merely by listing Non-Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares. Therefore, listing these preference shares will not confer listed-company status on the company. Hence, the Company Secretary's suggestion is not justified.
Topics: Securities Law and Capital Markets
Related Questions in this Topic
- Rohit has applied to the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA) for inclusion of his name in the data bank of inde...
- Shantilal, a customer of Cotton Textile Pvt. Ltd. intends to apply in writing to the company for inspection of its lates...
- Chairman of the CSR Committee.
- Number of CSR Committee Meetings.
- The functions of the CSR Committee under the statute.